No evidence for consistent virus-specific immunity in simian immunodeficiency virus-exposed, uninfected rhesus monkeys

NL Letvin, SS Rao, V Dang, AP Buzby… - Journal of …, 2007 - Am Soc Microbiol
NL Letvin, SS Rao, V Dang, AP Buzby, B Korioth-Schmitz, D Dombagoda, JG Parvani…
Journal of virology, 2007Am Soc Microbiol
Defining the immune correlates of the protection against human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 (HIV-1) acquisition in individuals who are exposed to HIV-1 but do not become
infected may provide important direction for the creation of an HIV-1 vaccine. We have
employed the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)/rhesus monkey model to determine
whether monkeys can be repeatedly exposed to a primate lentivirus by a mucosal route and
escape infection and whether virus-specific immune correlates of protection from infection …
Abstract
Defining the immune correlates of the protection against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) acquisition in individuals who are exposed to HIV-1 but do not become infected may provide important direction for the creation of an HIV-1 vaccine. We have employed the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)/rhesus monkey model to determine whether monkeys can be repeatedly exposed to a primate lentivirus by a mucosal route and escape infection and whether virus-specific immune correlates of protection from infection can be identified in uninfected monkeys. Five of 18 rhesus monkeys exposed 18 times by intrarectal inoculation to SIVmac251 or SIVsmE660 were resistant to infection, indicating that the exposed/uninfected phenotype can be reproduced in a nonhuman primate AIDS model. However, routine peripheral blood lymphocyte gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT), tetramer, and intracellular cytokine staining assays, as well as cytokine-augmented ELISPOT and peptide-stimulated tetramer assays, failed to define a systemic antigen-specific cellular immune correlate to this protection. Further, local cell-mediated immunity could not be demonstrated by tetramer assays of these protected monkeys, and local humoral immunity was not associated with protection against acquisition of virus in another cohort of mucosally exposed monkeys. Therefore, resistance to mucosal infection in these monkeys may not be mediated by adaptive virus-specific immune mechanisms. Rather, innate immune mechanisms or an intact epithelial barrier may be responsible for protection against mucosal infection in this population of monkeys.
American Society for Microbiology